Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stony Island Hall

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Stony Island Hall]]=

:{{la|Stony Island Hall}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stony Island Hall}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Stony Island Hall}})

Article which makes no claim to notability and does not present multiple, independent, non-trivial sources TM

Merge to the UC article. No indication there are multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage needed to show notability for a standalone article. Edison (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Merge non notable residence hall, merge any usable content to University of Chicago.—Sandahl (♀) 23:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep - this is one of many, many articles about university housing which User:Namiba is attempting to delete by PROD, redirects and AfDs. I respectfully suggest that he work toward consensus at WikiProject Universities before proceeding unilaterally. Racepacket (talk) 01:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:Again, Racepacket, this is not a vote. What is your rationale for keeping the article? How does it pass the established norms of WP:GNG?--TM 01:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

::References to demonstrate notability? Edison (talk) 21:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Merge this and any other relevant residence halls to University of Chicago housing. I believe this needs to be the default for all residence hall pages. It tremendously eases maintenance, gets rid of the stubby articles, helps monitor for vandalism (much easier to vandalize a particular hall if nobody else is looking), and allows editors to read about the housing character of a university collectively, as opposed to in a bunch of broken stubs about individual halls. (Same comment I've left on the others). Shadowjams (talk) 21:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
:CommentHaving a standalone article about the housing /dorms at a particular university is the thing to do if a section of student housing would make the article on the university too long. That will be the case for some schools but not all. Edison (talk) 18:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

:The vast majority of campus residences are not notable. I agree that WP:Universities needs to come up with a suitable policy, but until that happens, we need to judge these articles by the standards all other articles are judged by, namely WP:GNG.--TM 19:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. No claim to notability, let alone evidence of it. (And I deplore the suggestion that a WikiProject try to devise its own notability criteria. That's un-necessary instruction creep: WP:GNG is a perfectly adequate test). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete This relatively new dorm is one of the least distinguished or noteworthy of all the UofC's residence halls. Speciate (talk) 04:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.