Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Leadership Consultation
=[[Strategic Leadership Consultation]]=
:{{la|Strategic Leadership Consultation}} ([{{fullurl:Strategic Leadership Consultation|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategic Leadership Consultation}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
a non notable event with no third party coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1990&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Strategic+Leadership+Consultation%22&scoring=r&hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Strategic+Leadership+Consultation%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go] LibStar (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. This is apparently some kind of conference for church leaders, a fact that its name (that smells like a cow pasture) fails to convey clearly. A [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22strategic+leadership+consultation%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=2Em&start=10&sa=N general Google search] yields only 317 hits, some of which are just the usual malarkey you'd expect from a name like that, and none of them that I found look like independent reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 14:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I found some [http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Strategic+Leadership+Consultation%22 Google News] and [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Strategic+Leadership+Consultation%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Google Scholar] results, but the Scholar results are primary sources and the only News result doesn't constitute significant coverage. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.