Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straulino

=[[Straulino]]=

:{{la|Straulino}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Straulino}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Straulino}})

Article (created by his agent) on an apparently humdrum fashion photographer about whose work very little has been written disinterestedly. Hoary (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 13:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Endofskull (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2010 (UTC) .... deleted by Endofskull in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FStraulino&action=historysubmit&diff=396725901&oldid=396605120 this edit]
  • Endofskull, Reason for deletion is required in this instance, not some arbitary decision, like the kings or emperors of old :) scope_creep (talk) 00:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:N. Since it's made by his agent, it seems like self-advertising. Thanks for catching that Scope and Hoary! :D Endofskull (talk) 16:22, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment. Specifically, the agent is "Trunk Archive" (under the name "PhotoFan76"): see this ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=396304468#trunkarchive.com permanent link]). (Another Trunk photographer now at AfD is "Kutlu" [AfD].). -- Hoary (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. There are thousands of photographers like this ("beauty and eroticism" won't be unusual anytime this century). Johnuniq (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.