Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StudentUniverse

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=StudentUniverse}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=StudentUniverse}})

I deleted this as advertising under a variant title many years ago. It remains a cross between an advertisement and a company web page. It certainly fails the current version of WP:NCORP DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete and salt:No evidence of notability, recreated multiple times. Lots of SPAs in the edit history which makes me wonder if there was paid editing as well. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to :Flight Centre: The present article text is little more than a summary of the firm's market proposition followed by a roll-call of each mundane announcement that the firm has made. If it was copy-edited to address this, most of this material about the comings and goings of company recruitment would probably be erased; regardless, it is trivial coverage at :WP:CORPDEPTH. The firm was acquired by :Flight Centre in 2015 and continues to be operated as a brand, so a redirect seems reasonable. AllyD (talk) 08:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete and salt: I'm with Pi -- our forbearance has been abused enough. Ravenswing 17:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Redirect to Flight Centre. Per WP:INHERITORG, subsidiaries do not inherit notability from their owner. However, seeing as this is a subsidiary, I don't see a reason against a redirect to the parent company's article, where the subject could be reasonably covered. However, if there is a redirect, I would like to see that redirect given ECP so as to prevent this from going back to AfD after a motivated individual restores the article. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete this item of significant abuse of the no-promotion policy, whose supporting sources are tellingly mostly ads and advertorials. When something is put up on Wikipedia without the necessary support we do not send it/redirect it elsewhere; we delete it. And, since the probability of interested parties reposting the content is indeed high, the suggestion to salt it is well founded. -The Gnome (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:NCORP --Devokewater ^(talk) 17:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.