Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujeet Swami
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Both "keep" and "delete" !votes are rather weak, except for the nom. However, even after 2 relistings no new sources that are substantial enough to tilt this over GNG have been found. As this is a BLP, I find the "delete" case stronger. Randykitty (talk) 17:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Sujeet Swami]]=
:{{la|1=Sujeet Swami}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sujeet Swami}})
Fails WP:BIO. Not a social activist in the traditional sense. Known for a single event, getting his 35 Rupees back. Coverage all stems from one event. scope_creepTalk 20:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
DELETE: Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Also fails to meet WP:BIO as pointed by scope_creep.Advait (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC){{small|Suspected sockpuppet of blocked user {{np|Vinodtiwari2608}}. ✗plicit 03:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)}}- Keep Notable for multiple events. Article having enough citations to justify the notability of the subject. Few references which are from reliable resources and independent of the subject like [https://zeenews.india.com/hindi/india/rajasthan/66-percent-teachers-are-not-available-in-rajasthan-technical-university/625462?fbclid=IwAR2qYP_hpLGRyxFLnNqPkieN3OxUc-nvekgwT6gWo6ziBYbQDaU8uFxMFJI शिक्षकों के लिए तरस रहा सबसे बड़ा तकनीकी विश्वविद्यालय, 66% पद पड़े हैं खाली] (Zee News), [https://www.hindustantimes.com/jaipur/a-year-on-kota-engineer-continues-to-battle-irctc-for-rs-35-refund/story-CC07oUVzDXu1fncioOxqQI.html A year on, Kota engineer continues to battle IRCTC for Rs 35 refund] (Hindustan Times), [https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/one-year-on-kota-engineer-persists-in-getting-rupees-35-refunded-from-indian-railway-catering-and-to-1844327 This Article is From Apr 28, 2018 For ₹ 35 Refund, This Engineer In Rajasthan Chased Railways For A Year], (NDTV), [https://hindi.news18.com/news/himachal-pradesh/mandi-iit-mandi-terminates-its-employee-sujeet-swami-hpvk-1655904.html जिसने IIT मंडी में उठाई भ्रष्टाचार के खिलाफ आवाज, उसे ही प्रबंधन ने किया टर्मिनेट] (News 18), [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59689587.cms?utm%20source=contentofinterest&utm%20medium=text&utm%20campaign=cppst High court notice to railway over ticket refund rules] (Times of India), [https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/railways/indian-railways-earned-rs-9000-cr-from-ticket-cancellation-charges-non-cancellation-of-wait-listed-tickets-in-three-years/articleshow/74301314.cms Indian Railways earned Rs 9000 Cr from ticket cancellation charges, non-cancellation of wait-listed tickets in three years] (The Economic Times), [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/info-officer-cant-pass-order-on-behalf-of-faa-says-cic/articleshow/73146111.cms Info officer can’t pass order on behalf of FAA, says CIC] (Times of India), [https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/replace-private-schools-on-iit-campuses-with-kvs-delhi-hc/articleshow/72100765.cms Replace private schools on IIT campuses with Kendriya Vidyal] (The Times of India) and many others. DMySon (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
::Its still all one-event stuff. If he hadn't lost his 35 Rupees and his temper, none of this would have happened. That is a true definition of being non-notable. He didn't create these events, under his own impetus, it was created for him. So its WP:BLP1E fodder. scope_creepTalk 15:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Does Not meet WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 06:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete because coverage are all very similar. They are talking same thing but different words. Mtpos (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Per {{noping|DMyson}}. Best Regards.---✨LazyManiik✨ 05:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)strike sock vote Meters (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG. Advait (talk) 08:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)strike sock vote Meters (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG.27.5.75.113 (talk) 12:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sujeet Swami is a notable personality for more than one event. And thus passes WP:GNG. 132.154.2.143 (talk) 03:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
::What else is he known for exactly? scope_creepTalk 14:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Notable for two different events 1. [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/72100765.cms Replace private schools on IIT campuses with Kendriya Vidyal] and 2. [https://www.hindustantimes.com/jaipur/a-year-on-kota-engineer-continues-to-battle-irctc-for-rs-35-refund/story-CC07oUVzDXu1fncioOxqQI.html IRCTC Railway Refund]. And many references available on reliable resources. Saahil Vats. Passes Wikipedia Guidelines WP:NBIO. (talk) 10:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.