Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sulakshana (actress)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 06:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Sulakshana (actress)]]=

:{{la|Sulakshana (actress)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sulakshana_(actress) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sulakshana (actress)}})

Non-notable actress. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment - she has starred in a lot of notable films. Why are you saying that she is not notable? Spiderone 21:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep - Very famous South Indian actress. Here is an interview with The Hindu - [http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/Grill-Mill-Sulakshana/article15411773.ece]. She shares her name with a Hindi actress who is subjected to a lot of tabloid gossip. That is the reason why her Hindi counterpart hogs all the search results. Better references can be obtained if a person has the time to go through the results. Jupitus Smart 06:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 14:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. IMDb lists 29 roles. Only a few seem to be non-minor, but probably passes WP:ARTIST. Since the nominator didn't bother to explain why she is not notable (WP:ITSNOTNOTABLE is the same fallacy as saying ITSNOTABLE), in essence not providing any argument at all, I think this is an invalid AfD anyway. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep 350 plus films in four south Indian languages, with Times of India noting that she has done multiple acclaimed roles.[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/news/Sulakshana-Comeback-queen/articleshow/11697632.cms] This is a keep per WP:NACTOR. Lourdes 18:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Meets WP:NACTOR as noted by Lourdes above. Gab4gab (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep as she meets WP:NACTOR, she is notable. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds 20:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.