Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Zauq Nadvi
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Sultan Zauq Nadvi]]=
:{{la|1=Sultan Zauq Nadvi}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Sultan Zauq Nadvi}})
This BLP article has been tagged for the use of unreliable sources since 2020. Wikipedia's strict standards for Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) require that all content be supported by reliable and verifiable sources. Upon review, I found that the article cites eight sources, six of which are entirely unreliable, including local book-selling websites, while another provides only a trivial mention. The article relies almost entirely on Nadvi, Jasim ad-Din (2019); however, no direct link is provided, and the reference appears to be from a [https://www.qowmipedia.com/page/%e0%a6%ae%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%93%e0%a6%b2%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%a8%e0%a6%be-%e0%a6%ae%e0%a7%81%e0%a6%b9%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%ae%e0%a7%8d%e0%a6%ae%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%a6-%e0%a6%b8%e0%a7%81%e0%a6%b2%e0%a6%a4%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%a8/ user-generated website], which does not meet Wikipedia’s reliability standards. I considered removing the material cited from this user-generated source, but doing so would leave the article as little more than a one-line stub. Due to the lack of reliable, independent secondary sources, the subject fails to satisfy the notability guidelines outlined in WP:Scholar, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:GNG, and therefore, the article is not eligible for retention and should be deleted.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 03:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 03:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Islam. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG,WP:AUTHOR and WP:Scholar.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:03, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know whether this matters, but it is now no longer a BLP; Nadvi is dead. Kelisi (talk) 15:48, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom Somajyoti ✉ 12:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.