Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Energy Services

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SOFT DELETE. Because of low community participation in this discussion treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason. J04n(talk page) 12:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Summit Energy Services]]=

:{{la|Summit Energy Services}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Summit_Energy_Services Stats])

:({{Find sources|Summit Energy Services}})

non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete - only passing mentions in major sources. I'd change my mind if anyone can find something more substantial. Bearian (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.