Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunanda Pushkar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. However, with recent comments post relist and sourcing notes and improvements, leaning towards a Keep on this one. -- Cirt (talk) 09:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Sunanda Pushkar]]=

:{{la|Sunanda Pushkar}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunanda Pushkar}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Sunanda Pushkar}})

Non notable. Only claim to fame is her association and subsequent marriage with Shahshi Tharoor and the IPL Kochi controversy. The article has been deleted and recreated by the same user several times. Shovon (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:N--Wikireader41 (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete - not notable on her own. --Sodabottle (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Relisting comment. The article has no inline citations but the external links section contains 2 news articles specifically [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/iplarticleshow/6178445.cms about] [http://news.in.msn.com/national/article.aspx?cp-documentid=3812108 her]. Is it enough? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 02:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Keep I have added references for every statement currently in the article. While she is most known because of the event with the equity, she has since become notable for both her marriage and, really, being famous now in general. [http://www.indianexpress.com/news/suddenly-sunanda/607683/0 This] very in-depth article convinces me of her notability. Silver seren^C 05:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Keep she qualifies because she is notable for more than 1 thing and gets coverage for it [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Sunanda+Pushkar&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 07:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.