Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Deluxe

:{{la|Super Deluxe}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Super_Deluxe Stats])

{{search for|Super Deluxe}}

:({{Find sources AFD|Super Deluxe}})

No substantive refs for notability at all. Sources tell us that the domain name is registered and that the company exists but nothing else. A search throws out a few items such as [http://variety.com/2016/digital/news/turner-super-deluxe-surfdotco-video-site-1201719647/ this] but nothing at all substantive appears. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

:WP:KEEP The Super Deluxe page is verified, please remove the "considered for deletion" notice as soon as possible. Check below for verifiable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperDeluxeBloom (talk • contribs) 23:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

:Substantive Verifiable Sources:

:http://www.superdeluxe.com/

:https://www.facebook.com/superdeluxevideo/

:https://www.youtube.com/c/superdeluxe

:https://vimeo.com/superdeluxevideo

:http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/turner-resurrects-digital-content-venture-super-deluxe-exclusive-1201600066/

:http://time.com/4240298/straight-outta-compton-trailer-oscars/

:https://www.oxygen.com/very-real/this-boss-ass-btch-cartoon-celebrates-empowered-ladies

:http://www.papermag.com/kanye-west-ellen-appearance-super-deluxe-1815857214.html

:http://www.afterellen.com/people/477419-jen-tullock-hannah-pearl-utt-disengaged — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperDeluxeBloom (talk • contribs) 22:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC) — SuperDeluxeBloom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep. One of the links in the mess posted above me here goes to [http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/turner-resurrects-digital-content-venture-super-deluxe-exclusive-1201600066/ a different Variety article about Super Deluxe] from last October that says that it's the primary hub for primarily- or only-online content from Turner Broadcasting. Any such branch of Turner would probably be notable without question if it were a television network or a magazine or something, and I'm not seeing why this is different. Although since the Variety piece also says that this project doesn't have a lot of attention right now, I wouldn't get upset to see this article folded into Turner Broadcasting System... RunnyAmiga (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

• Keep

:WP:KEEP: Based on the articles published by Variety, their Facebook page and their YouTube channel, the information in the article is valid.

:http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/turner-resurrects-digital-content-venture-super-deluxe-exclusive-1201600066/

:http://www.superdeluxe.com/

:https://www.facebook.com/superdeluxevideo/

:https://www.youtube.com/c/superdeluxe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Losangelesfan03 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC) — Losangelesfan03 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment - please read WP:GNG before coming here with comments. Facebook and YouTube and all such social or vanity sources are not acceptable as references on Wikipedia. This is a discussion about notability and not how many user-names you can invent in order to comment here.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as it's obviously newly founded and there's nothing at all here for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Comment to closer – See WP:NEXIST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

• Keep – The topic meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Some reliable sources that provide significant coverage are listed below. Sometimes the default "find sources" links atop AFD discussions do not provide much coverage; sources can often be found by customizing search terms a bit and not relying only on Google. See also: Criticism of Google § Possible misuse of search results. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

• Comment - That's all still only coverage to suggest it has gotten said coverage now, but nothing yet actually suggesting the solid independent notability for its own article, the other alternative would be to move and link to Turner Broadcasting System...thus my "independent notability" notation. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

• Keep The sources linked by {{user|Northamerica1000}} from The Hollywood Reporter, Variety, and TV.com provide significant coverage about the subject. Here are two more sources I found:
  1. {{cite news |date=2006-10-30 |title=TBS to launch 'Net comedy outlet next year |url=http://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2006/10/30/TBS-to-launch-Net-comedy-outlet-next-year/38281162252487/ |agency=United Press International |accessdate=2016-06-04 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6i1TzJkJa |archivedate=2016-06-04 }}
  2. {{cite news |date=2006-10-31 |title=Turner site to offer TV-quality comedy |url=http://infoweb.newsbank.com/resources/doc/nb/news/1151C35879FEEC80?p=AWNB |newspaper=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution |accessdate=2016-06-04 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6i1U9RsSx |archivedate=2016-06-04 }}
  There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Super Deluxe to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

  I think there is enough coverage of the subject to justify a separate article from Turner Broadcasting System.

  Cunard (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - Super Deluxe is notable, especially with their recent Donald Trump related videos.

:Additional Links:

:*http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/a-political-satirist-for-the-internet-election

:*https://www.vice.com/read/vic-berger-iv-is-vines-strangest-political-satirist

:Yoshiman6464 (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

• Keep References and notability now established by other, non SPA, editors. Aoziwe (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.