Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Genius (album)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Super Genius (album)]]=

:{{la|Super Genius (album)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Super_Genius_(album) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Super Genius (album)}})

Subject is a non-charting album without the amount of sources required to comply with GNG. It has a primary source, its label's website, but that alone (I could not find other reliable sources), does not help much at all. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Contemporary reviews found from Option ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7ytLAAAAYAAJ&q=%22circus+lupus%22+%22super+genius%22&dq=%22circus+lupus%22+%22super+genius%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjU4Z33x5HRAhXCYFAKHUH8DiwQ6AEIJzAD]) and CD Review Digest ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=azE5AQAAIAAJ&q=%22circus+lupus%22+%22super+genius%22&dq=%22circus+lupus%22+%22super+genius%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjU4Z33x5HRAhXCYFAKHUH8DiwQ6AEIKzAE]), plus retrospective coverage from teamrock.com ([http://teamrock.com/feature/2016-10-24/the-10-most-underrated-dischord-records-albums]), A.V. Club ([http://www.avclub.com/article/part-3-1992-disconnected-102648]), and Trouser Press ([http://www.trouserpress.com/entry.php?a=circus_lupus]). Further print coverage from the time of its release is very likely. --Michig (talk) 09:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 02:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to the band page. I went through some of the sources and included them but at the moment they are too thin on the ground to warrant a page on its own considering the criteria under WP:MUSIC. Karst (talk) 12:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.