Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superfunctional
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
=[[Superfunctional]]=
:{{la|Superfunctional}} – (
:({{Find sources|Superfunctional}})
Article about a product that does not establish the product's notability. Page about the company selling it was speedily removed as spam. An earlier of this page was too, but I don't know what the content was ({{U|TheLongTone}} was the nominator). PROD declined by page author. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable product from a non-notable company. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - press release without any references.--Rpclod (talk) 03:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: A :WP:SPA article on a product with no visible notability. AllyD (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone above me - Non notable product with no evidence of any notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.