Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersci

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. It is possible with enough time there would be enough participation to come to a consensus, but this has already been relisted twice. Malinaccier (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Supersci]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Supersci}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Supersci}})

Nominated by an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#AFD_Request:_Supersci IP user]: Non-notable group, going by available sources. Both with its current ("Supersci") and its former ("Superscientifiku") name, the group is mentioned on some Swedish websites, but with very few exceptions (e.g. Sundsvalls Tidning) either these sources are non-reliable, or the subject is mentioned only in passing. GrabUp - Talk 18:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

::In 2011, their "Timelines" was nominated (again, did not win) at the sv:P3 Guld. Example sources, at Sveriges Television [https://www.svt.se/kultur/nomineringarna-till-p3-guld-klara here], and at Sveriges Radio P3 [https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/4220806 here]. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 05:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

:Keep, I've added three different sources that provide significant coverage. The article meets WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. AlexandraAVX (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

::Can’t check offline sources, but linked sources are not WP:SIGCOV.

::* 1st [https://www.st.nu/artikel/supersci-bjuder-pa-annorlunda-liveset source]: Are only sayings of connected ones of the subject, no in-depth coverage of the subject.

::* 4rth [https://www.svt.se/kultur/nomineringarna-till-p3-guld-klara source]: Nomination list of the award P3, I don’t know how much this award is notable. GrabUp - Talk 04:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

::*:1st source: I see what you mean, though the offline sources are more independent of the subject.
4th source: The nomination doesn't confer notability, but I thought it was worth mentioning since it was brought up in the AfD. AlexandraAVX (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

::*:I found the third source (or at least an article about the same thing by the same author) online, so added it to the article if you want to take a look. AlexandraAVX (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Further evaluation of added sources would be helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 01:50, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep - Sources and added sources since nom shows notability at least per WP:NMUSIC at this time. I say Weak Keep. BabbaQ (talk) 09:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.