Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersnack

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

=[[Supersnack]]=

:{{la|Supersnack}} ([{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supersnack}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Relatively new organization that doesn't seem to meet notability requirements. PHARMBOY (TALK) 14:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Of the five sources, two are from The hosting university of the organization, which means that they may not be independent enough to satisfy WP:RS. The other three sources are unavailable except for purchase, so I cannot verify what they do or do not say. If they're newspaper articles, then we need the original citation (date, issue, whatever). Even with the information we have, I do not think notability exists for this organization, and I can find no additional sources that would show notability. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 14:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.