Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surf na crvenom talasu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Surf na crvenom talasu]]=

:{{la|Surf na crvenom talasu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Surf_na_crvenom_talasu Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Surf na crvenom talasu}})

Fails WP:NBOOKS. No significant coverage in either English or Serbian publications. The article was created by a single-purpose account. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

: Logs: 2007-09 {{color|red|✗}} CSD A7

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

del. No sources, abandoned. No "soft deletion", since no shred of notability present. May be undeleted into editor's user space, per someones request who wants to rescue it. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete. In fairness, there is some coverage ([https://www.novosti.rs/%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8/%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0.487.html:203908-%D0%98%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%80%D0%BF%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3-%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0 Novosti], [https://www.rts.rs/page/radio/sr/story/1466/radio-beograd-3/944816/hronika-treceg-programa.html Short mention on RTS], [https://www.adanja-polak.com/emisije/mira-adanja-polak-i-vi/mira-adanja-polak-i-vi-28-oktobar-2007/ Presumably featured in Adanja Polak's TV show]), but not enough to surpass the "significant" mark. No such user (talk) 08:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.