Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survata

:{{la|Survata}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Survata Stats])

:({{Find sources|Survata}})

Nonnnotable market research company Staszek Lem (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

• Keep - This company passes WP:CORPDEPTH per the following coverage:

:*[http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/06/04/the-daily-startup-survata-to-take-a-bite-out-of-online-research-market/ The Wall Street Journal]

:*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alejandro-rojas/less-god-less-extraterrestrials_b_3999273.html Huffington Post]

:*[http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/20/yc-backed-survata-wants-to-replace-paywalls-with-research-friendly-surveywalls/ Techcrunch]

:*[http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/19/founders-den-demo-night-spring-2013/ Techcrunch]

:{{spaced ndash}}NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 00:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep per North America. The sources provided by the continent seem more than adequate. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.