Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan L Combs
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The consensus was that the subject's notability was insufficient to warrant an article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
=[[Susan L Combs]]=
:{{la|Susan L Combs}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Susan L Combs}})
Non-notable individual. Has been quoted in a number of magazines, and been interviewed, but I don't see anything in-depth about her. Appears to fail WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete no actual evidence of notability, and no reason to expect any. I removed an A7 speedy, because there is enough of a claim to importance from the trade award to pass speedy--though not for actual notability. DGG ( talk ) 07:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now and I doubt anyone would be interested to draft/userfy to their space - My searches found nothing particularly good aside from some [https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Susan+L+Combs&gws_rd=ssl#q=Susan+L+Combs+Combs+%26+Company&hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0 links here]. SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I did a little cleaning and rearranging of content, removing some of the relatively non-consequential pieces of info; there was some disconnect between content and citation, so I fixed that up too. This is someone early in their career who is now the elected president of a national association and a company founder -- albeit neither of those association or company have articles on wikipedia. There is sufficient 2ndary source material to support the article, and I think she is just over the edge of notability to justify retention ... I'm not arguing she's a stellar entrepreneur, but that she just makes it over the line of notability, in my opinion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:44, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete promo advert, no indication of notability in the article, run-of-the-WP:MILL entrepreneur, no significant coverage, web searches turn up social media and directory listings. Kraxler (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, the "Entrepreneur" source is just a trivial mention, and I'm not sure that "CAFNR News" is sufficiently independent, but the two references from "LifeHealthPro" are substantial and about her, and it seems to be a real publication (not a blog), albeit one with quite a narrow focus. Probably just enough here to squeak her over the WP:GNG line. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't see any real notability here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Didn't find much, not sure about the CAFNR news as a source, did find brief coverage [http://www.wnyc.org/story/137348-blog-tri-state-volunteers-aid-ongoing-relief-efforts-joplin-missouri/ here], still don't think it adds up to GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.