Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Mary Auld
=[[Susan Mary Auld]]=
:{{la|Susan Mary Auld}} ([{{fullurl:Susan Mary Auld|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Mary Auld}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Fails WP:BIO; the only information I can find on this person is from other unsourced wikis. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 12:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Infromation gathered from obituary released by family members:
Pioneering naval architect Susan Auld dies at 87
AP Worldstream; March 14, 2002Aunty Helen (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 14:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep has an article in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/76749 (you'll need subscription or UK library ticket to be able to view the full article. David Underdown (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. DNB articles are only given to people who definitely exceed our notability requirements. Also as the first woman in a previously male-dominated profession she is most definitely notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Together both David and Necrothesp have nicely summarized my view. - Mgm|(talk) 08:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep but ntag as a stub. The existence of a DND article is clear evidence of notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.