Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Andreae
=[[Susanne Andreae]]=
:{{la|Susanne Andreae}} ([{{fullurl:Susanne Andreae|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Andreae}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Not notable. Although she has published three books, these were introductory manuals and not original research. Wikipedia is not here to list publications. Mr.K. (talk) 15:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
- Of course keep ! She is notable enough. Concerning notability, its more or less depending on notions like space & time, in five years almost 99% of the people included for notability in the english wiki, - will be forgotten in real live ! So long, keep Andreae ! Pinus pinea (talk) 05:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, the article doesn't establish notability, and I can't find evidence of her work having much impact/visibility. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Nomoskedasticity. Note that the [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susanne_Andreae corresponding article] on [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Hauptseite German Wikipedia] is somewhat more detailed, but even that entry does not really make any strong claim to notability. Also note that the previous "keep" opinion was tendered by the article's author, Pinus pinea. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC).
- delete fails WP:PROF, no evidence of impact of her work on the work of other scholars. Pete.Hurd (talk) 03:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.