Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Sandeep Chaitanya

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:01, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Swami Sandeep Chaitanya]]=

:{{la|Swami Sandeep Chaitanya}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Swami Sandeep Chaitanya}})

Not notable swami without sources to assert notability. Wikid ^as© 10:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep: Article need expansion but can be retain. Bill william compton (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:Comment: The person is well known identity among the Hindus of South India, specially in Kerela. He is the founder of religious school (School of Bhagavad Gita) in Thiruvananthapuram. He represents hindu community at international religious conferences like Parliament of the World's Religions. His show Sampoorna Geeta Jnana Yagnam was telecasted on the national channel of India and on DD Malayalam. He has covered on major newspapers of India and not once but several times, like The Hindu- second largest circulated daily English newspaper in India and highest in South India. What else he needs, which would prove his notability??? Bill william compton^Talk 20:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete No sources say that the subject is notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Note The subject remains not notable. There are no reliable sources that attribute notability to the subject. As such, the article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete as per nomination. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 19:57, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

: comment: In general, I think the subject might be notable. However, I am unsure if the spelling is correct? The School of Bagavad Gita's website (which is linked to at bottom of article) gives the founder's name as Swami Sandeepananda Giri. Also, should Swami be part of article title? It is title, not part of his name, (like Bishop in Christian). so Bishop Desmond Tutu is a redirect to Desmond Tutu. Would there be any way to check the Hindi Wikipedia for either name, or the School? VikÞor | Talk 00:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Third-relist rationale: To allow participants to evaluate Vik-Thor's suggestion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:BIO. the 5 gnews hits don't reveal much. most of the coverage merely verifies he exists. LibStar (talk) 13:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

:Comment: (for Vik-ThorThe) real name of the subject is Sandeepananda Chaitanya Giri, but in many places it is written as Sandeep Giri or Sandeep Chaitanya, Chaitanya is his middle name (just like Varahagiri Venkata Giri, Venkata is middle name and Giri is surname) and Sandeep is generally a North-Indian name; so in most of the North-Indian texts it is Sandeep and yes, word Swami shouldn't be use here, its an honoring title in Hinduism, like Lord in British peerage; it can be change but the main issue is whether this article should retain or not.

::(for LibStar): go to the article and try to tackle references of newspapers and major websites like Parliament of the World's Religions, observe them carefully. Bill william compton^Talk 13:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.