Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swan 70

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

=[[:Swan 70]]=

:{{la|Swan 70}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Swan_70 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Swan 70}})

Fails WP:GNG. Searches come up with nothing, there aren't any reliable sources covering this. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete per nom. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 20:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock—UY Scuti ^Talk 16:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 13:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Delete - an infobox, corporate link, and purported reference in one book does not show notability.--Rpclod (talk) 21:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete I am concerned about the factual accuracy of this. I would say do a TNT delete here and let someone else who is interested start it again. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.