Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarl

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 21:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Swarl]]=

:{{la|Swarl}} ([{{fullurl:Swarl|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarl}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Declining A7 speedy, judgment call. Although much of this is promotional of a particular yahoo group, there is potentially some salvageable encyclopedic information. You make the call. - Dank (push to talk) 13:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 13:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - I think this is salvageable as an article. Jenuk1985 | Talk 13:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. According to WP:INTERNET, web sites are notable if they have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. From a quick [http://www.google.ca/search?q=swarl Google search] you can see on the first page that you've got [http://digilander.libero.it/paoloalw/swarl_365_day_contest_2009.htm this page], but there's not enough to constitute the 'multiple' 'independent' sources needed by the criteria of WP:INTERNET, so I'll say weak delete. JulieSpaulding (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Any salvagable information should be merged into Amateur radio, but most pertinent information is there already. Passportguy (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.