Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swifty Mcvay

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to D12. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

=[[Swifty Mcvay]]=

:{{la|Swifty Mcvay}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Swifty_Mcvay Stats])

:({{Find sources|Swifty Mcvay}})

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources to merit a separate article. All his significant work has been done with D12, with nothing significant done as a solo artist. I would support a redirect to D12, but we already have Swifty McVay, so no point. STATic message me! 21:33, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

  • Make redirect and add an html comment below the redirect of Swifty Mcvay similar to the one I just added to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swifty_McVay%20%28rapper%29&redirect=no Swifty McVay (rapper)] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swifty_McVay&redirect=no Swifty McVay] and pointing to Talk:D12#Swifty McVay. Why leave a redirect? If this person ever becomes notable, the existing histories will come in handy. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 03:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:GNG, not enough coverage. Koala15 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.