Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symons Type

:{{la|Symons Type}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Symons_Type Stats])

:({{Find sources|Symons Type}})

No indication of notability, or even that it exists outside one person's farm. No references, no hits on G-books, only relevant hit on Scholar is a c.v. for one Lynton Barry Symons. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 00:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete It just seems like a well developed credibility campaign. --Michael (talk) 17:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete per nom. Could be a really lame hoax for all we know. --Richard Yin (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
• It really doesn't help that the one external link on the page consists entirely of 2 links to seemingly unrelated sites. --Richard Yin (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.