Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synod of Saint Timothy

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Synod of Saint Timothy}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Synod of Saint Timothy}})

I found nothing on this group. The 2009 Melton's encyclopedia of American religions has nothing on this group. Both websites given in the article are dead. The other website given in [https://web.archive.org/web/20091116155427/http://www.christiansynod.org/ the last working archive of the website of this group] (2009) has [https://archive.fo/7Sf3d one archive] from 2013. None of the two website give us any clue to try to find any shred of notability for this group. The article has been created in 2006, and since then no one has added any single source which could be used to argue the notability of this group.

All I have been able to find on this group is [https://celticepiscopalchurch.com/Information%20Page/Book%20of%20Services%20Page/index.html this page] of a non-notable denomination, which states: "Father Robert Lyons [...] has also served as the Chair of the Worship Commission for the Christian Church - Synod of Saint Timothy (and it's predecessor, the Society of Saint Timothy)."

Therefore, as per WP:NCHURCH, I think this article should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

EDIT: this article seems to have alreay been deleted by an AfD once in 2005, was privately kept here, and was recreated in 2006. Veverve (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Veverve (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. At best, this appears to have been an extremely small denomination, with insufficient coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. This article has no references, and of the two external links, one is broken and the other goes to a web-hosting service for churches with no mention of this denomination. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
• Comment -- We do normally allow articles on denominations, even very small ones, but the article gives me no confidence that it has more than half a dozen congregations. The alleged synodical website is a dead link and the one about inter-communion with another splinter denomination leads to a page about building church websites, though possibly [https://celticepiscopalchurch.com/Information%20Page/Book%20of%20Services%20Page/index.html this site] is relevant, being a book review of their liturgy. My initial view is that this is too small to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.