Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBD Law

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:TBD Law]]=

:{{la|TBD Law}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TBD_Law Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|TBD Law}})

PROD was removed by article creator on the basis of adding "reference to show notability" which I still think doesn't meet WP:INDEPTH or the event passing WP:EVENTCRIT —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 11:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete. It's a year-old legal conference, and I don't see the slightest sign that anyone's really even taken note of it. --Calton | Talk 02:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –XboxGamer22408^talk 02:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete No indication of sustained coverage. Mduvekot (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.