Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tabernacle of Faith International

:{{la|Tabernacle of Faith International}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tabernacle_of_Faith_International Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tabernacle of Faith International}})

No assertion of notability per WP:ORG. Can't find anything about the church online in WP:Reliable sources, apart from brief local news coverage of when their school caught fire. Core article of a WP:Walled garden of articles on its pastor, local chapters, its youth group and its school, all of which similarly don't assert notability per WP:ORG (or WP:BIO in the case of its pastor), with no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Altered Walter (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages as noted above:

:{{la|Ray Llarena}}

:{{la|Tabernacle of Faith Christian Academy}}

:{{la|Forerunners National Youth Movement}}

:{{la|Tabernacle of Faith International Gateway}}

:{{la|Tabernacle of Faith International Pasig}}

:{{la|Tabernacle of Faith International Romblon}}

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 08:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

• Delete all - I feel sorry for the students of their school which caught fire, but other than that isolated incident, I can't find anything reliable. Please note that there are many, many of these "born-again" (as Filipinos call them) churches, and not all receive reliable coverage, since most are small and/or low-profile (I myself have several friends who are "born-again"). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

• Redirect Sub-article(s) – The main article should remain, and information from sub-articles be merged. It ain't a small church though. Israel (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace_Mendiola (talk • contribs)

::Please sign your comments with ~~~~, and please don't use your old account name when signing your posts. Altered Walter (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• Keep main article. Merge rest. The absolute membership is not clear, but with 38 satellite/daughter churches, it is beginning tolook morelike a denomination than a sinlge church. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

::The article says "It originally had 38 churches located throughout the Philippines with several outlying chapters.", but so far there's no way to WP:Verify even this claim of former membership. Altered Walter (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

• Delete. It doesn't matter how many churches they claim to have. There is a distinct lack of reliable sources on this denomination, excepting the newspaper articles on the fire. Majoreditor (talk) 04:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
• Delete all. I didn't find any convincing evidence of notability, and the vast majority of content fails WP:V. --Michig (talk) 10:14, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

---

• Comment - Meets WP:NOTABILITY but fails WP:VERIFY --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 08:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
• Delete Appears to fail in a number of ways - we've failed to verify things, and IMHO, that's a potential failure of notability in some sense. SarahStierch (talk) 02:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
• Delete - very small denomination, with little visible way to verify each chapel or congregation. Bearian (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.