Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical Assault

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Tactical Assault}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical Assault}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Tactical Assault}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:55, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Tactical Assault]]=

:{{la|1=Tactical Assault}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tactical Assault}})

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no suitable or reliable sources or reviews to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE and no reviews on [https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/tactical_assault Rotten Tomatoes]. The Film Creator (talk) 01:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 01:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete. I found a trade review, but nothing else that I could use to establish notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.