Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallia Storm

=[[Tallia Storm]]=

:{{la|Tallia Storm}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tallia_Storm Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tallia Storm}})

Primarily Fails WP:BLP1E - she supported Elton John on one single Tour Date - Otherwise also failing WP:MUSIC. Generally not widely notable - no bias to article recreation if she happens to score a top 40 album or single... Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 11:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep I think if her notability was judged only on her published music output, you would have a good point. But the quantity of media references suggest that she is notable for a variety of other reasons. We may never hear of her again, but I think she has made her mark. --Iantresman (talk) 12:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak keep She just about escapes WP:BLP1E due to the coverage of her as a fashion icon/celebrity, which suggests she has continuing fame fter the one event. However, her career is so short that it's hard to tell if she'll have lasting renown. If it's deleted, I would suggest userfy/incubate in case she does have a career in the future. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:*The fashion Icon/Celebrity angle appears misleading - A mixture of misused primary sources, secondary sources with no actual content (Elle, Daily Mail), and unreliable secondaries. When you cut that out there is little beyond the one event (of note). Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

::*I would appreciate you expanding on the use of sources on the Tallia Storm talk page.--Iantresman (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:::*Have replied at Talk:Tallia_Storm#Use of Sources but it's reasonably relevant to this discussion as well. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


  • Weak delete - the originator may be correct. --Nouniquenames (talk) 22:39, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.