Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallukh (film)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a significant amount of paid promotion and sockpuppetry (see SPI) surrounding this article, which is about a film whose only distribution is through Amazon Prime Video, which allows [https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/landing almost anyone] to publish videos on their platform. The consensus is clear that the film fails to meet the standard of notability documented at WP:NFILM. Mz7 (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Tallukh (film)]]=

:{{la|Tallukh (film)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tallukh (film)}})

paid for spam with no real critical coverage, fails WP:NFILM Praxidicae (talk) 11:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep - Active articles listed here are from genuine Indian newspapers and legal sources. With all the copyrights and trademark official and legal, it should not be deleted because legally its proved original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhairya Gupta Actor (talk • contribs) 10:09, October 15, 2020 (UTC)

::— {{user|Dhairya Gupta Actor||}} has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. Cabayi (talk) 12:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

::Striking per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dhairya Gupta Actor. Mz7 (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 12:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Delete - to pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, ideally, we would need at least two reviews of reasonable length from reliable secondary sources. I couldn't find any. If someone does find some, please ping me Spiderone 17:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep- https://www.nagpuroranges.com/nagpur-based-boys-embark-with-a-film-ready-to-stream-on-amazon-prime/amp/ https://thelivenagpur.com/2020/09/04/tallukh-movie-shot-in-city-released-in-us-uk/ Here are 2 reviews for the movie. Tempestbuda (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC) — Tempestbuda (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

::Neither of those are reviews. They are both run of the mill press releases. Spiderone 08:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

::Striking per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dhairya Gupta Actor. Mz7 (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep- https://asianmoviepulse.com/2020/07/new-poster-and-details-of-upcoming-hindi-film-tallukh/

https://www.nagpurtoday.in/amp/tallukh-a-film-shot-in-nagpur-to-be-release-on-sep-11/07311451

it is possible that some of the wiki editors aren't satisfied with all the info but that does not change the fact it is recognized by asianmoviepulse that is a notable platform as well as nagpur today that is also a notable news section. Passing the WP criteria we have articles independent of the subject. As well as verified editors of respective pages have published them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4042:4E8E:BC18:0:0:5B4B:EA0C (talk) 12:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC) — 2409:4042:4E8E:BC18:0:0:5B4B:EA0C (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

::Those are both press releases. Where is the significant coverage? Also, why are there no reviews? Spiderone 20:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Delete: per nom and SpiderOne (though I would expect three as a minimum), does not meet WP:NFILM. Waggie (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Keep:User:Waggie i would like you to please consider it a margin and keep the article as it is just one article below your expectation. We can get one more article about the film if given some more time, if that satisfies the eligibility. 2409:4042:102:839A:DD5B:F36E:43C0:58DF (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC) — 2409:4042:102:839A:DD5B:F36E:43C0:58DF (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

::It's not one below expectation. Waggie expects three independent reviews and this film has exactly zero Spiderone 23:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.