Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanaza (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Tanaza]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanaza}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Tanaza}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tanaza_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tanaza}})

A promotional PR article that would have to be wholly rewritten to conform to Wiki's standards. All sourcing is either WP:ROUTINE or comes from press releases and blackhat SEO sites. Attempted to draftify the article to allow it to incubate, but page creator almost immediately published it back. So here we are. Not convinced they pass WP:NCORP, while googling for news hits brings back results, it's just page after page of press releases. At best this would have to be slashed and burned till there is little to nothing left. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom - refbombing with churnalism and press releases do not a notable company make. Separately, I'm curious about what exactly a "USA TRADEMARK PATENT" is. creffett (talk) 02:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm the editor of the article. I contest this notice: I've not any type of economic according with Tanaza in order to write this page. The page has references to Facebook, Il Sole 24 Ore, Yahoo Finance and two sources to USA TRADEMARK PATENTS!!!! There lots of article from Wi-Fi sector newspapers.

:The article talks about what Tanaza is and what it does. It's not a press release! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marco Papavero (talkcontribs) 22:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

::It was a wonderful early effort, I hope you continue to improve Wikipedia! However, in the future so your hard work isn't deleted for notability, I would recommend you spend a few hours picking through WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Also, this page will look far more notable if you could help find third party newspaper coverage that isn't in English? 67.243.20.177 (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

  • I was only able to find the two sources below to help, and so think at this point Delete would be sensible unless a merge of some sort would work. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

::*[https://www.silicon.co.uk/brandvoice/tanaza-collaborates-internet-service-providers-wifi-projects "Tanaza collaborates with Internet Service Providers on WiFi projects"], Marina Santos Martos, Silicon.co (November 14, 2017)

::*[https://techcrunch.com/2012/09/30/italians-take-up-the-torch-to-ignite-their-own-tech-startup-scene/ "Italians Take Up The Torch To Ignite Their Own Tech Startup Scene"], Mike Butcher, TechCrunch (September 30, 2012)

  • Delete I agree, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete - confirmed paid-for spam. MER-C 13:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.