Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarek dika

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 by {{user|Secret}}. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[Tarek dika]]=

:{{la|Tarek dika}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Tarek dika}})

Does not meet the requirements of WP:ACADEMIC. PROD contested by anonymous IP editor. Favonian (talk) 10:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete, fails WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:BIO. Warrah (talk) 03:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, A graduate student, with no evidence of notability under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. As with most [http://johnshopkins.academia.edu/TarekDika students], open-and-shut case. Anon de-prodder should have had the courtesy to save us the work for such an obvious delete. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC).
  • Comment. An editor claiming to be Tarek Dika has removed most of the information from the article with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tarek_dika&diff=326378361&oldid=326377514 this edit]. I interpret the summary to imply that he would like the article deleted. In view of the emerging consensus, could we speedy the article? Favonian (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Being Bold and nominating it for speedy deletion as per above. Tresiden (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.