Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariku Anega

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Tariku Anega]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Tariku Anega}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tariku_Anega Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tariku Anega}})

Fails WP:GNG and possibly fails WP:ANYBIO. The subject is cited only by 2 sources and both are bare URLs. I couldn't obtain much information about this subject in Google search index. Abishe (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete under A7. The subject of the article is an [https://am.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E1%8A%A0%E1%89%A3%E1%88%8D:Tariku_Anega am.wiki user]. If they are the same person as the article creator, it’s an autobio. Mccapra (talk) 09:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete, possibly speedy. No signs of WP:NPROF. One book is not going to make WP:NAUTHOR, and I'm skeptical about whether the book is notable. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete; the subject's book is more-or-less WP:SPS and also see WP:SCHOLARSHIP. Book was published by Lambert which is a subsidiary of OmniScriptum which, I believe, is at least problematic for the sake of establishing notability. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete, possible speedy A7. There may be a language barrier in finding sources here but no notability is evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete not even remotely close to being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.