Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Lorgat

:{{la|Tariq Lorgat}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tariq_Lorgat Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tariq Lorgat}})

fails WP:NTENNIS Mayumashu (talk) 02:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

---

: Keep Article may fail WP:NTENNIS, however I am seeing significant media coverage through the first five pages of a simple Google search. Seems to meet WP:GNG.Keystoneridin (speak) 03:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - Review of first 10 pages of google results didn't show any obvious reliable source treatments of the subject (I didn't notice any reliable sources in the results; zero direct sources in news search). I assert GNG is not obviously met, and NTENNIS is specifically failed (for now). / /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:NTENNIS and no evidence that it meets CNG --Wolbo (talk) 00:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - I saw no real sources on Google... the first hits are this wiki article, twitter and youtube stuff. Nothing at the ATP or ITF sites either. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:50, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.