Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tathlith

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

=[[Tathlith]]=

:{{la|Tathlith}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tathlith Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tathlith}})

Single source points to an Arabic page. scope_creep talk 17:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

  • There is a Tathlith (at least with Latin characters) in Saudi Arabia just north of Yemen, [https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Tathilith,+Asir+Province+Saudi+Arabia&hl=en&ll=19.55979,43.505859&spn=0.058717,0.06566&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&geocode=FdWKKgEdKtCXAg&hnear=Tathilith,+Asir+Province+Saudi+Arabia&t=h&z=14] but I can't find one in Yemen. Sources are allowed to be in non-English languages. --Oakshade (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. As Oakshade noted, I think this refers to the Tathlith governorate in southwest Saudi Arabia, which has a population of about 50,000 and is prima facie notable. The citation initially given did not mention Tathlith at all, but the confusion may have come from the area having been part of one or more historical definitions of Yemen (for example, the Yemen Vilayet). I have updated the article to reflect this. —Neil 03:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep. The Arabic-language Wikipedia article confirms that Tathlith is a governorate of Saudi Arabia. --Cerebellum (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:43, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.