Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tazeen Fatma

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Tazeen Fatma}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tazeen_Fatma Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tazeen Fatma}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Person is wife of Azam Khan but that's not criteria to have Wikipedia page of hers.

She didn't receive any major coverage in WP:RS to have Wikipedia page dedicated to her. Here, most of the sources used are non reliable and doesn't help to receive the WP:Notability. Like,

1. Fails WP:RS

2,3,4,8. Websites of government. Repeated citation. Doesn't help to achieve notability.

5. Fails WP:RS

6. Website of university where she studied.

7. WP:RS but again she is mentioned as spouse of someone.

9. Not Reliable source and only negative mention about her regarding case on her son.

I don't think Tazeen need any Wikipedia page. Hence, this debate. Harshil169 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

• Keep as an elected member of India’s Upper House, described as a ‘leader’ and pro-chancellor of a university, she’s certainly notable significant. Mccapra (talk) 06:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. She meets WP:NPOL "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or sub-national (e.g., province- or state-wide) office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels" as a member of the upper house of India's national parliament. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. What the hell? nominator WP:IDONTLIKE ??? Clearly she meets WP:NPOL: Current or Former member of parliament are always notable. 117.18.229.108 (talk) 11:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC) 117.18.229.108 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Keep meets WP:NPOL. Note also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Azam Khan (2nd nomination). --Muhandes (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per those above Mosaicberry (talk • contribs) 13:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep - Another case of WP:JDLI from this editor on a notable Indian woman. Please see WP:BEFORE as the subject clearly meets notability criteria WP:NPOL. Netherzone (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

::{{ping|Netherzone}} Don't bring gender in between and refrain from doing sexist comments. See the references of the page, one government site is cited by 4 times. Other citations are negative and some are not reliable. If you don't know then visit India deletion sorting. I have submitted some other articles too for deletion. Remove glasses of gender before commenting, stuck on policies. --Harshil169 (talk) 04:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

• Strongly Keep according to this source here [https://www.india.gov.in/my-government/indian-parliament/dr-tazeen-fatma 1] [http://164.100.47.5/newmembers/Website/Main.aspx 2] [http://164.100.47.5/Newmembers/women.aspx 3], She is a Member of Parliament. Pass WP:POLITICIAN.--Nahal^(T) 10:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep NPOL. ∯WBG^converse 13:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. Article does need some improvement, but people who verifiably served as members of state legislatures pass WP:NPOL #1. Bearcat (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep per those above. --SalmanZ (talk) 22:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
• SNOW Keep Clearly passes WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Satisfies WP:NPOL. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
• Keep passes WP:NPOL is a member of the Rajya Sabha the upper house of the Indian Parliament.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.