Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Impact

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as non-notable based on the arguments of the nominator. —Sean Whitton / 12:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

=[[Team Impact]]=

{{ns:0|G}}

:{{la|Team Impact}} ([{{fullurl:Team Impact|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Impact}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article about a rugby sevens team that does not meet notability. The team is a social team formed for a non-notable local tournament with no coverage in reliable sources writing about the team. The references provided are the host club web site, their own facebook groups and another rugby website. The ballsout rugby website is just a link to a homepage without explanation as to why it is even a reference.

The article was originally proposed for deletion but the PROD was removed when two additional references were provided. However, the references are a news article in a local paper that covers the tournament and mentions the team as the team as the winner, and the other reference is from the host club's website. The addition of these two references does not correct the deficiency in reliable sources. Whpq (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: - The current version of the article shows only two references. Earlier versions prior to the PROD removal had a different set of references. -- Whpq (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete-I found nothing on this subject on an engine search and it fails WP:N.SRX 16:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 04:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.