Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Zeigler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Ted Zeigler]]=

:{{la|Ted Zeigler}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Zeigler}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Ted Zeigler}})

This actor has had several small roles, not "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows...". See the generally accepted standards on notability for entertainers. ErikHaugen (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep: Let his page stay. Some of the roles listed are in supportive roles. Rtkat3 (talk) 6:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Neutral for now. Appears to have had a significant (supporting at least) role on The Sonny & Cher Comedy Hour, but other major roles don't appear on Wikipedia as yet - will research later to see if they are likely notable. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Weak Delete Nothing else with a significant role for him appears to be notable. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 09:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete appears to be involved in very small roles (i.e. "additional voices"), and is best known for something so obscure we don't have an article on it. Unlikely this person would have reliable sourcing enough to satisfy our verifiability policy. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.