Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Bottlerocket

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 00:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Teenage Bottlerocket]]=

:{{la|Teenage Bottlerocket}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Teenage Bottlerocket}})

Minor punk band, sources cited are either not independent (e.g. band's own MySpace) or incredibly trivial (e.g. Punknews one sentence blog post stating they are releasing a new single). Guy (Help!) 09:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep I'm not at all a fan of neo punk, however, I believe it is possible to compile an informative article based on reliable sources. During my quick search among the hundreds of thousands of G-hits I found following: [http://www.pbpulse.com/music/concert-reviews/live-shows/2009/10/14/teenage-bottlerocket-for-the-skatepunk-in-all/] The Palm Beach Post, [http://exclaim.ca/News/exclusive_teenage_bottlerocket_turn_marky_ramone_around] Exclaim!, [http://www.spinner.com/2010/03/14/teenage-bottlerocket-interview-sxsw-2010/] Spinner, [http://spinmagazine.com/articles/hot-punks-teenage-bottlerockets-skate-or-die] Spin. I believe that a real encyclopedist - punk fan could make a more thorough research. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep. Also covered at Allmusic ([http://www.allmusic.com/artist/teenage-bottlerocket-p767884/biography bio], [http://www.allmusic.com/album/total-r859740/review review], [http://www.allmusic.com/album/warning-device-r1311355/review review]).--Michig (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep - Don't judge the notability of an article's subject only by the sources placed by less knowledgeable editors. A web search finds that this band has been well-covered but everybody neglected to put better sources in the article. It needs expansion and improvement, not deletion. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep: Sources found by the above editors demonstrate sufficient notability for Wikipedia. --IllaZilla (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.