Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tegenaria rhodiensis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawal of nomination indicated by nominator. (non-admin closure)‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Tegenaria rhodiensis]]=

:{{la|1=Tegenaria rhodiensis}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tegenaria rhodiensis}})

Not notable. No sources can be found, no suitable pages to redirect or merge were found, and it also fails WP:V even more so than WP:N. Equal width (C) 10:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep No suitable WP:BEFORE was done; multiple sources are trivially easy to find, added three. Valid species with clear taxonomic history. Suggest withdrawing this. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

For the nominator, the relevant guidance is at WP:NSPECIES; basically valid species are invariably keep. Elemimele (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep, obviously, per WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎ 14:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with sources per Elmidae, contrary to the nomination statements. KoA (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.