Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tenth Crusade (CounterPunch)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Tenth Crusade (CounterPunch)]]=
:{{la|Tenth Crusade (CounterPunch)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Tenth Crusade (CounterPunch)}})
Neologism used by an opinion columnist. There is no evidence that this phrase itself has substantial, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Neutralitytalk 22:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:43, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a term does not become notable simply because a political columnist coins it.NotButtigieg (talk) 14:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism and flash in the pan. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:57, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with above, this is a neologism Dartslilly (talk) 03:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Historically accurate record of perceptions post 9/11. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.