Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa J. Domzal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jujutacular ^talk 00:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

=[[Teresa J. Domzal]]=

:{{la|Teresa J. Domzal}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa J. Domzal}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Teresa J. Domzal}})

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF or other notability guidelines. Stifle (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Weak keep She has published in academic journals, and her articles are cited by others - up to 58 citations which is significant. She is dean of a school at a smallish London university, in addition to a significant post with the Defense Intelligence Agency. I think she probably makes it as notable, recognizing that academics don't tend to get things written ABOUT them. --MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Keep per MelanieN. Jenks24 (talk) 15:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.