Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Termux

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Termux]]=

:{{la|Termux}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Termux Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Termux}})

Jumble of aimless text about non-notable subject. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Delete - I was unable to find any reliable third-party sources on the subject, and the article itself doesn't have any either. Fails to meet WP:GNG. - Aoidh (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete - sources are neither reliable nor independent nor do they have any value in asserting notability. This has not been helped by the blatant COI editing over the last two days. A big give -away was this Linux link in one ref wget https://sdrausty.github.io/TermuxArch/setupTermuxArch.sh which seems to clarify the relationship between the recent prolific editor and the article subject. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Do not delete: Check the links and references for requested information. --SDRausty (talk)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.