Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Donovan Mansfield

:{{la|Terri Donovan Mansfield}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Terri_Donovan_Mansfield Stats])

:({{Find sources|Terri Donovan Mansfield}})

The article is only sourced with primary references and I can't find any reliable independent sources to prove notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete, Nothing found by me except a little New Age babble. Not enough for WP:GNG. No hope of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC).
• Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF, and all I can find of her in a Google news archive search is that she writes letters to local newspapers (so she also doesn't pass WP:GNG). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:03, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO.--Eric Yurken (talk) 19:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete. No WP:RS – all the references are pointers to defunct web pages. Agricola44 (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC).
• Delete Not a notable person, despite all the titles she spins around herself.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete does not pass WP:GNG. --Nlfestival (talk) 02:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.