Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrorists, Killers and Middle-East Wackos

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Terrorists, Killers and Middle-East Wackos]]=

:{{la|Terrorists, Killers and Middle-East Wackos}} ([{{fullurl:Terrorists, Killers and Middle-East Wackos|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrorists, Killers and Middle-East Wackos}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Lots of bittorent links on Google, but no reliable sources that would indicate encyclopedic notability. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Merge To Bud Dwyer or Bum fights article. Enough notability to be included in existing articles. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge Ledenierhomme (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge I've cited the rejection of the film by the BBFC, which makes it notable in a UK context, as few non-porn films are, while it is also being used as an example of the online content the Board suggests should be rated in the UK. That said, there probably isn't enough to justify a page in it's own right, so a merge with Bumfights would be most appropriate. Nick Cooper (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable cruft. It doesn't seem like an article of any noteworthiness LOTRrules Talk Contribs 22:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - I don't think the article is of any value, the article doesn't contain many citations, if it were to kept it would need to be made more reliable. afkatk (talk) 04:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

::More citations does not equal more reliable. If it's referenced by reliable sources it is reliable. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

::: I should have worded what I meant to say better but that is basically what I meant by adding more citations. --afkatk (talk) 14:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep. I agree with Nick that the fact it wasn't given a license in the UK is notable since it is such a rare event. Merging to Bumfights seems inappropriate since they only have the makers in common and the films aren't actually part of the same series. It's solid stub article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: agree with Mgm's reasoning here. JamesBurns (talk) 03:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.