Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That TV

:{{la|That TV}} ([{{fullurl:That TV|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That TV}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Alleged new Weigel Broadcasting digital subchannel network that is supposed to be coming soon as a compliment to This TV. However, the only 'source' seems to be a screenshot of a silent channel of WCIU-TV which seems to be more to decorate the screen of a silent channel featuring anything but a test pattern and an in-joke referring to "this and that". There are no other sources to be found and no press releases from Weigel or This TV partner MGM have come out about a That channel, nor have I found an equivalent subchannel on Weigel's Milwaukee stations to confirm the Chicago screens. Also, the article text is odd, descibing items such as pay cable channels coming to free TV as subchannels, which is incredibly unlikely. Nate • (chatter) 00:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete non-existent channel and OR presumption that the screenshot is actually an announcement of a new channel. Completely fails WP:V, and obviously WP:N. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Comment There really is a subchannel in Chicago called "That", and it consists solely of the screen seen in the article. However, I've yet to see any reliable sources that explain what the channel is supposed to be, so we might as well delete the article for now, and consider recreating it when we have something concrete to say. Zagalejo^^^ 04:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I'^mperator 16:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That TV||}}

• Delete - Per Nom. If more information and references can be found, the creator of the page is welcome to remake it at that time. Until then, it should be deleted. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.