Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 6ps of luxury marketing (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[The 6ps of luxury marketing]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 6ps of luxury marketing}}

:{{la|The 6ps of luxury marketing}} ([{{fullurl:The 6ps of luxury marketing|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 6ps of luxury marketing (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No real change from previous AFD nomination, quote: "Non-notable marketing model. Article fails to demonstrate significant, third-party coverage, and simply seems promotional of a particular brand marketer's idea". No references establish notability, provided references are either to the marketing company, or to textual details (e.g. that wealthy buyers sometimes use "fractional ownership"). Studerby (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete per G11 (blatant advertising) and salt. See first nomination. --Edcolins (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete G4, reproduction of previously deleted material. Rklear (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy delete (G4) and create-protect as extra-sodium spam. MuZemike 03:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.