Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Clone

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 05:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[The Clone]]=

:{{la|The Clone}} ([{{fullurl:The Clone|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Clone}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I question the notability of the subject, and the legitimacy of the edits. The article is uncited, and there seems to be a pattern of dropping indirectly related references to those that ARE notable, in order to make the subject appear notable as well.

Please remember that being asked a question by a reporter does not increase notability.

Relationships do not confer notability - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED

Trivial coverage is not sufficient to establish notability - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO#Basic_criteria Freqsh0 (talk) 04:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Lots of unverified info and very little verifiable coverage to establish notability. Of the few cited sources that are supposed to mention the subject, none are more than passing mentions ([http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/1999/07/20621][http://globalgoodys.com/ifj17/][http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/340]) and one is a broken link[http://www.whittierdailynews.com/news/ci_3751612]. Not enough here to pass either WP:BIO or WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.