Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Color Bars

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[The Color Bars]]=

:{{la|The Color Bars}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Color_Bars Stats])

:({{Find sources|The Color Bars}})

Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:BAND. No reliable sources. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:Where did you look? These were found from a quick Google search: [http://www.daytoncitypaper.com/goofing-around/], [http://musicfashionmagazine.com/read/thecolorbars/000095], [http://www.columbusunderground.com/on-the-verge-the-color-bars], [http://chicagoist.com/2011/12/29/rockin_my_turntable_in_2011_tankboy.php], [http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/color-bars-040114]. --Michig (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:*Google News, Nexis, and Google Books. I've read most of these. In many AFD debates, I have found that blogs like Chicagoist aren't considered reliable sources. Further, brief mentions or interviews with bandmembers don't confer notability. I would agree that the first article in Dayton City Paper is the most reliable, but I wouldn't say this band has significant coverage in reliable sources from just one or two articles. -- Wikipedical (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete despite efforts from Michig. Needs truly reliable sources, and then more than trivial mentions. The WP:GNG calls for sources that are reliable in the sense that they have standards for editorial fact checking, and with significant coverage that's more than a trivial mention. Agree that an interview might be useful to verify some facts about the band, but not independent enough to establish notability. Vcessayist (talk) 01:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Agree with Wikipedical, it fails to meet the criteria in WP:BAND. Kooky2 (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.