Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cro-Magnons
=[[The Cro-Magnons]]=
:{{la|The Cro-Magnons}} – (
:({{findsources|The Cro-Magnons}})
Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG no significant 3rd party coverage found that would allow it to pass. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 23:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment if this is deleted, it should redirect to Cro-Magnon. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
:Agreed. -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 13:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes Band:2 ([http://www.oricon.co.jp/music/release/d/671546/1/]), Band:5 ([http://www.oricon.co.jp/artists/h/400707/]), and Band:6 (contained in the article). 218.225.52.157 (talk) 03:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Two major-label albums and hitting the chart = passing WP:MUSIC -- we keep 'em. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep band with notable members, charting releases, signed to a major label... everything looks good as far as I can tell. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets notability criteria. Qö₮$@37 (talk) 17:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:BAND criteria 2, 5 and 6 per that anon IP. The article, however, should be cleaned up to remove OR. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 20:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.